From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 28 15:29:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D81278 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [75.148.37.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74B81175F for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.125] (23-24-150-141-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [23.24.150.141]) by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1655C50D333 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:29:32 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: postfix depends on db41?? From: LuKreme In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:29:31 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <43FB3256-2787-41B6-8AAF-6534C8BA730E@kreme.com> References: <6BC7F72E-32AE-42B5-A7FB-01849F05178C@kreme.com> <44d2i8w0ab.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:29:37 -0000 On 27 Feb 2014, at 18:42 , Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >=20 >> LuKreme writes: >>=20 >>> # portmaster mail/postfix210 >>> [...] >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from = ports >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to install databases/db41 >>>=20 >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> postfix210-2.10.3,1 >> databases/db41 (1/1) >>>=20 >>> Why? >>>=20 >>> postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf is set for = version 5.3 >>>=20 >>> # cat /etc/make.conf >>> WITH_PKGNG=3Dyes >>> WITH_BDB_VERS=3D5.3 >>=20 >> You mean WITH_BDB_VER (no 'S')? Well, yes, that might make a difference. dammit. > And also just 5, not 5.3? I am pretty sure I tried that. I went ahead and built manually which = built against db48. I'll mess with db5 next time. --=20 If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before.