From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 11:27:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6FF1065684; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spamd@stu.cn.ua) Received: from stu.cn.ua (stalker.stu.cn.ua [195.69.76.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F238FC25; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spamd@stu.cn.ua) Received: from stu.cn.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stu.cn.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13632247E13; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:21:46 +0200 (EET) Received: by stu.cn.ua (Postfix, from userid 58) id ECDBB247E12; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:21:45 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on stalker.stu.cn.ua X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.6 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by stu.cn.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0932476F0 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:21:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767CA1643F2; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1185106566B; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495F0106566B for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8D38FC1F for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:18:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c8so259897wra.27 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:18:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=DwBOT4irXlYv3l5hrjDn2TQ6i5yKhEwyGLGkI3VXUjQ=; b=vxhlFXHAv9YGeefe7rVQtII22iUP/rrjOLC1S+1HDrwMhycCfJ3seLoTMv7VOLikKd V3AJnx+2EVKNp0uFlvnrTxvMwa1c+9y78fuVVZe5yEDML/6vDbwws5Oa0GPqcFL6P76e OYuWv8Sf8eGEh3FXzl2+HZPj3oBzZ6x1w3nf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=u0e/CzGtZRzIKJ+av02lrQT8Ve5GnUCq8uaRqT0tCu4b3g+RsrZhk1hU9lijNAa8Fj uhu1bcqb8M78GU3CKrhv5rbQKOhEz+GgyEQpN7R0iR/em6Mx11tWRyNisamW2VtlKH2y 0uhH3VWiwxU6RLxuN6Qiyc03LKz6TdWSNowoo= Received: by 10.65.234.18 with SMTP id l18mr5080202qbr.1.1225030715500; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.201.9 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:18:35 -0100 From: "Eduardo Meyer" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on stalker.stu.cn.ua Cc: Subject: NAT-PT on FreeBSD (or something else)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:27:37 -0000 Hello, I want to start a migration education to IPv6, setting up my internal network to be 100% ipv6-only. I dont want it to be dual stacked, because I intend to force my team to perform only IPv6 related tools on the internal network. However, when performing internet activity like, reading e-mail or browsing the web, its impossible to avoid IPv4 today. I want them to be able to reach IPv4 network (internet) transparently. When DNS resolve to IPv4, they will ask the gateway (ipv6, dual stacked), who will put their v6 address in the v4 network. How can I accomplish that? Is NAT-PT the only way? If so, how can I get NAT-PT on FreeBSD? Your opinion: do you think this approach can be used for end users? I mean, someone with windows vista and teredo, is already getting IPv6 address since my FreeBSD is advertising it. However they are dual stacked. I want people to be v6-only and still can visit v4 networks transparently, without technical knowledge (say, my girlfriend who is not a geek). I guess this is a migration/education strategy, which I intend to deploy, but right now I am only studying. Will faith(4) do this for me? -- =========== Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"