From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan  7 18:40:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA05303
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jan 1996 18:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA05298
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 7 Jan 1996 18:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA09320; Sun, 7 Jan 1996 19:42:35 -0700
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 19:42:35 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199601080242.TAA09320@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Do we want to bring the BSDI 2.x compat code in?
In-Reply-To: <20830.821057086@time.cdrom.com>
References: <20830.821057086@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Subject says it all.  Feedback?

I'd like to see it in the next stable SNAP, simply because it appears
that BSDI 2.0 binaries are becoming more common.