From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Mar 27 11:21:48 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA00194 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 11:21:48 -0800
Received: from sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu (eastham.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu [146.245.1.21]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA00188 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 11:21:46 -0800
Received: from robeson.brooklyn.cuny.edu (robeson.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu) by sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1a)
	id AA24843; Mon, 27 Mar 95 10:54:38 EST
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 95 10:54:38 EST
From: dayton@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu (Dayton Clark)
Message-Id: <9503271554.AA24843@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu>
Received: by robeson.brooklyn.cuny.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA21661; Mon, 27 Mar 95 10:54:37 EST
To: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: ruserpass() in rexec()
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I'm porting a locally developed distributed processing system to
FreeBSD 2.0R from SunOS4.1.3.  In libcompat.a rexec() invokes
ruserpass() which is nowhere defined.  The code following the call to
ruserpass() seems to do what ruserpass() was intended to do, so I
removed the call.  Things seem to work alright.

Is this a bug that's been fixed (and I missed it in the mail) or am I
missing something.

dayton


      _________
_____/    D    \_____________
|                           |
| Dayton Clark              |
| CIS Department            |
| Brooklyn College/CUNY     |
| Brooklyn, New York  11210 |
|                           |
| 718/951-4811              |
| dayton@brooklyn.cuny.edu  |
|___________________________|