From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Thu May 19 14:51:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00D5B42AB7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2016 14:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@freebsd.org) Received: from gritton.org (gritton.org [162.220.209.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.gritton.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA44A1FC3 for ; Thu, 19 May 2016 14:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@freebsd.org) Received: from gritton.org (gritton.org [162.220.209.3]) by gritton.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4JEoCnV091728 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 May 2016 08:50:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jamie@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by gritton.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4JEoCMB091727; Thu, 19 May 2016 08:50:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jamie@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: gritton.org: www set sender to jamie@freebsd.org using -f To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jails in different private subnets on the same host X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 08:50:12 -0600 From: James Gritton In-Reply-To: <07d67bd5-206c-edd8-7f47-ef2b5c538e01@gjunka.com> References: <07d67bd5-206c-edd8-7f47-ef2b5c538e01@gjunka.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: jamie@freebsd.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:51:40 -0000 On 2016-05-18 09:08, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > I just tried telnet 192.168.1.50 80 from the main host and from the > 10.33.1.40 jail. From the main host it works without issues. From the > jail it eventually connected after 15 or so seconds of waiting. That sounds like about the kind of timeout I'd expect from DNS resolution not working. If you're adding a new subnet when the jail is created, you'll need to do something to get a nameserver to listen to it. - Jamie