From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 3 14:14:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923B016A41F for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from tiltup.nepinc.com (tiltup.nepinc.com [66.207.136.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDD013C45A for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from haiti.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by tiltup.nepinc.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l63EEC9g052298; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:14:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <468A59AF.1050604@voidmain.net> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:14:07 -0400 From: Tom Grove User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070618) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <54357.74.64.6.149.1183317914.squirrel@mail.el.net> <3507.24.1.37.132.1183435028.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <20070703081111.B306.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> <20070703144558.36f87262@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070703144558.36f87262@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:14:11 -0000 RW wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:21:38 -0400 > Gerard wrote: > > >> On July 02, 2007 at 11:57PM Richard Lynch wrote: >> >> >>> ... >>> And there isn't any content I've felt deprived to not get. >>> >>> Obviously, folks who spend their free time (or work-time :-)) >>> watching youtube would feel differently, but... >>> >> Personally, I disagree. Many sites that I use, including business >> sites, require the use of Flash. Your statement that Flash is only >> relevant for those who view 'YouTube' is grossly incorrect. It is due >> to the numerous problems of getting Flash to work correctly under >> FreeBSD, regardless of which browser the end user is employing, that >> I keep a Windows machine so as to facilitate the viewing of Flash >> content. >> >> IMHO, this is one of the reasons that more users do not use >> alternative operating systems like FBSD. ... >> > > Can anyone comment on how well Flash9 works in a real Linux > distribution? > > In particular does it have the problem where the flash item turns > into a blank box after a few seconds. If that problem exists in Linux > there's a decent chance it will get fixed by Adobe. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I will say that my limited use with Debian testing (Lenny) and Flash was actually quite pleasant. Flash worked on almost all sites very well. I'm not all that familiar with the process that the FreeBSD Foundation went through to get Java binaries but I am wondering if they could do something similar with Adobe to get a native Flash on FreeBSD. How possible is this? I know this probably goes against everything that BSD stands for but money talks in this day and age.' Would it be worth pursuing some kind of license agreement with Adobe so that the community or Adobe could start working on a native Flash for FreeBSD? -Tom