From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 1 23:34:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB73316A41F for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026CF43D49 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:34:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9C713788; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 01:34:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 01:34:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20060402004306.69646824@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Message-ID: References: <200604010014.k310EfbR089078@freefall.freebsd.org> <25452314@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060402004306.69646824@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, intron@intron.ac Subject: Re: [emulation] ports/95158: The port linux_base-fc3 misses two fundamental packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 23:34:26 -0000 On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > libselinux on the other side is a little bit different. I haven't > looked at the contents of this package, but it sounds like it's related > to "security enhanced linux". Yes, that's what it is. > AFAIK this needs kernel support, which we don't have. But this is just a > wild guess at midnight, it may be wrong... I believe you are right. The one thing I do not know is whether applications linked against libselinux, or libselinux itself, will fail graciously in case kernel support is missing. If this is the case, it might make sense to include it even if, obviously, we do not have the kernel support. Gerald