From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 19:20:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059D316A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:20:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net) Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3182943D46; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:20:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net) Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([65.7.181.160]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060203192014.EVNO1957.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net>; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:20:14 -0500 Received: from offworld.cqasys.com ([65.7.181.160]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060203192014.PWZY23047.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@offworld.cqasys.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:20:14 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.125] (unknown [192.168.0.125]) by offworld.cqasys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7EC3981B; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:20:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:20:12 -0500 From: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" To: vd@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <60E6BF36AF3114B65C8903B7@046BC845B756A9F9584BDE56> In-Reply-To: <20060203173404.GA14142@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <200602012250.k11Mo7w1026196@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060203173404.GA14142@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, "Jeffrey H. Johnson" , kris@obsecurity.org, mnag@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/92658: [PATCH] sysutils/heirloom: [Unbreak AMD64 build] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:20:17 -0000 On February 3, 2006 7:34 PM Vasil Dimov wrote: > Do you like the following: > [snip] > > It is aimed at the sizeof(int) != sizeof(int32_t) case. > Unfortunately there is no way to scanf int32_t portably. Seems to look good from here. -- Jeffrey H. Johnson CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net