From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Apr 24 21:24:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA13448 for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from becker2.u.washington.edu (spaz@becker2.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.68]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA13439 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost by becker2.u.washington.edu (5.65+UW96.04/UW-NDC Revision: 2.33 ) id AA09767; Wed, 24 Apr 96 21:24:27 -0700 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:24:24 -0700 (PDT) From: John Utz To: Sean Eric Fagan Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Has anyone grabbed the dos patches? In-Reply-To: <199604242340.QAA28330@kithrup.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Sean; Mike's mail re patches implied the need for a ~current box. Is this true? Has the kernel mutated to the point were this would be unusable on a 2.1R box? On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, Sean Eric Fagan wrote: > I've gotten no feedback; I don't know if Michael has. > > We need feedback, folks. There are some problems with the code (it > doesn't work, for example ;)), and one of the reasons we send out the little > announcements saying where the patches are is so other people can look at > the changes, and either find problems we haven't found yet, or find > solutions we haven't. > > Sean. > ******************************************************************************* John Utz spaz@u.washington.edu idiocy is the impulse function in the convolution of life