From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Jul 28 9:51: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9B514D70 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 09:50:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA13265; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:49:27 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:49:27 -0300 To: Nick Hibma Cc: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis , FreeBSD Hardware Mailing list , USB BSD list Subject: Re: USB Cameras Message-ID: <19990728134927.B13068@roma.coe.ufrj.br> References: <19990727184217.A6925@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: ; from Nick Hibma on Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 08:59:50AM +0200 X-Quote: What are you looking for in my mail headers ? X-Operating-System: FreeBSD X-URL: http://www.jonny.eng.br Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Somebody told me that Nick Hibma said: > > Is there any project to support USB video cameras in the near future? > A number of people have promised to look into it, but so far no one has > picked up on implementing isochroneous transfers in the USB source code. Is isochronicity really a must? Couldn't we just interpret it as a mass transfer device, and take snapshots from time to time? More important, is there some kind of standard, or should we create a driver for each manufacturer? Jonny -- João Carlos Mendes Luís jonny@jonny.eng.br Networking Engineer jcml@ieee.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message