From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 4 20:38:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61AA1065675 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784268FC0C for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so540746yhg.13 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=o0eVNhvgppr3Whbt6BAp+vEhV/e/+Gai6oi/huNU3Mk=; b=PaEHkvqIqz7bW4/kwPh/6CCi1lVzpaT1AKQN2BhvbGUC04pIC5COSNXRDemsVU2WQs q3KnBKHXjWjvynu56bDVX9Q5yZDlIavslqaur2nDJNofCRifbKAgmCYJGvqRWux/t6yG NVDJBWo8IJ14tKvDDB2GedYEiE8JjfPu5cDucBsdIq5T8sKNGaCBxvCKA/au2ObynM7W VnUAE3VLizXfk0S07+s7yi0Bn2SHmTlzgRzCvccJVSktPtMRUqKCYq8xHKlEbnNoyxWs 70GoaCgA2XRSm1fvz5DONnh8qNMzphQn7Gk8nZQnhhiUusk4vjpY9duSQ1fVWDVq1RhG xUDw== Received: by 10.236.193.70 with SMTP id j46mr3793250yhn.65.1333571895013; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d25sm6321408yhe.4.2012.04.04.13.38.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VNJsJ0d5zz2CG5d for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:38:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:38:11 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120404163811.1c2f6b9f@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4F7CAC9B.2070606@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120404065640.177c6b73@scorpio> <20348.13284.963931.392595@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20120404082712.26acc4b2@scorpio> <4F7CAC9B.2070606@FreeBSD.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlL1yFnqRA92CVC6Kw88j7VxvTA490mlQF55uXrdL6IhOox80aPoRpWF+UUiPC7ODvB83p/ Subject: Re: Updating GnuTLS to latest version X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:38:15 -0000 On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:18:35 -0700 Doug Barton articulated: > On 04/04/2012 05:27, Jerry wrote: > > The answer then is to simply do what has been done with other ports > > that have numerous major version numbers; i.e. Bash, MySQL, > > etcetera. Create a GnuTLS-2 and a GnuTLS-3 port and maintain the > > latest versions in each respective port. In fact, it is probably > > the only logical way to maintain this port correctly. Perhaps even > > creating a "GNUTLS_DEFAULT_VERSION=3" directive for the > > "/etc/make.conf" file. There are definitely numerous ways to handle > > this problem. > > When can we expect to see your POC for these changes? Around the same time as you learn to read and respect the prominently displayed request below my signature. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________