From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Oct 15  8:40:28 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E55A437B401; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C70AC43E9C; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03848;
	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:40:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g9FFdrF55615;
	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:39:53 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15788.14025.164591.788521@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:39:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: X problems & 5.0... -RELEASE?
In-Reply-To: <20021015123926.A76421@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
References: <15786.50928.826403.959175@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<Pine.BSF.4.21.0210141053301.33371-100000@root.org>
	<15787.1474.824422.286474@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20021014200045.GA51207@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20021015123926.A76421@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Tim Robbins writes:
 > 
 > It's worth noting that 4.7-RELEASE (w/ gcc 2.95.4) fails *more* test cases
 > than -CURRENT when -O is used to compile paranoia.

Does 2.95.4 fail the same tests or different ones?  

Also, this program doesn't deal with signals, which is where I suspect
the problem may be (ie, not the compiler but the kernel).  If you
understand this code, can you write and install signal handler for,
say, sigusr1 and have another programe fire sigusr1's at the math
test?

Drew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message