From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 09:05:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4ECED for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C0DFC0 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:05:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIIAOZMGVRR8YDT/2dsb2JhbABggw2BKtBpBAIBgRgXAXmEBAEBBDocIxALGAklDyoeBhOIQgG9aRiPSweESwEEnQmVR4NgOy+CSgEBAQ Received: from 211.128-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.128.211]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2014 11:05:24 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8H95Mrv003948; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:05:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:05:22 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: David Benfell Subject: Re: SOLVED: Re: What happened to mate? Message-ID: <20140917110522.08468cd3@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140917085521.GA29522@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20140917022427.GB19351@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140917024842.GA33509@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140917100142.5c0ffcad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140917085521.GA29522@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:05:32 -0000 On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:55:21 -0700 David Benfell wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:01:42AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Install at least x11/mate-base. It contains the minimum requirements. >> If you want all applications install x11/mate. > > Apparently x11/mate does not depend on x11/mate-base. I had the former > installed but not the latter. Installing mate-base seems to have > solved the problem. Hmm, x11/mate does depend on x11/mate-base. It may be best to remove it and then reinstall it, in case any other components are missing.