From owner-freebsd-ipfw Wed Mar 21 7:27:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from samar.sasi.com (samar.sasken.com [164.164.56.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FCD37B722 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:27:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sseth@sasken.com) Received: from samar (samar.sasi.com [164.164.56.2]) by samar.sasi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA28351; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:56:04 +0530 (IST) Received: from suns3.sasi.com ([10.0.36.3]) by samar.sasi.com; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:56:03 +0000 (IST) Received: from localhost (sseth@localhost) by suns3.sasi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA08481; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:56:03 +0530 (IST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:56:03 +0530 (IST) From: Satyajeet Seth To: Cc: Brahma Naidu Golla Subject: Routing Problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi I am having a machine with 3 interfaces, fxp0, nge0 and nge1. nge0 and nge1 are pseudo ethernet interfaces implemented using 'ng_eiface' netgraph nodes in freebsd-current. I wish that the response to ping from a machine on the LAN, host1 to fxp0/nge0/nge1 should come from the same interface. But it comes from the interface given by "route get 'host1'" unless we manually do "route change 'host1' -ifp 'interface'" host1 should be able to ping to fxp0, nge0 and nge1 simultaneously and the responses should come from the same interfaces. Is it possible to do this dynamically using ipfw,natd stateful rules? Or, perhaps there is some other better way? Thanks Satya To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message