From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 16:15:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1FDC421 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm136.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1FCF76 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hal9000.drpetervoigt.private (p549B4023.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.155.64.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s33GF1rK014680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:15:02 +0200 Received: from tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private (tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by hal9000.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65B5E1E0042; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:10:56 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after upgrade to CUPS 1.7.1 - gstoraster error Message-ID: <20140403181056.140745ee@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <533D7100.5010304@passap.ru> References: <20140402200945.41fc9887@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> <533D7100.5010304@passap.ru> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.4.3.160614 (Univ. Osnabrueck) X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report= RU_TLD 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1400_1499 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, MAILTO_TO_RU_TLD 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REPLYTO 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RDNS_POOLED_10 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: X X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:15:07 -0000 Am Thu, 03 Apr 2014 18:32:32 +0400 schrieb Boris Samorodov : > I've got a diff to update print/cups-filters from version 1.0.42 > to version 1.0.50. Please, dive it a try. It may help. (This patch > may not be committed as is since it does not build at 8.x due to > incomplete network headers). > > If that do not help, then try to enable debug (set "LogLevel debug" > at cupsd.conf) and look at logs (/var/log/cups/error_log in > particular) for any errors. > > Patch is included. Thanks for all advices so far. I would like to give this patch a try but I am worrying about possibly confusing pkg(ng) in case of having to downgrade again. If I got you right, Boris, your patch should upgrade print/cups-filters to version 1.0.50. If I have the need to downgrade again, I will use the original Makefile. Can I build and install the original version 1.0.42 again without confusing pkg(ng)? I ask because I am rather new to FreeBSD and right after having learned old pkg administration I am still in the process of understanding pkg(ng). I have learned from the forum and from own bad experiences that the package database can easily be mangled leaving you with a lot of work to get things running again. I should mention that my latest attempt of increasing the log level to "debug" did not reveal any additional helpful information - if I remember correctly :-) Regards, Peter