From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Oct 29 17: 4: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pelissero.org (dyn194-32.sftm-212-159.plus.net [212.159.32.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6817837B405 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:03:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wcp@localhost) by pelissero.org (8.11.6/8.9.3) id f9U13dq44176; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 01:03:39 GMT (envelope-from wcp) Message-ID: <15325.64619.48857.154819@hyde.lpds.sublink.org> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 01:03:39 +0000 From: "Walter C. Pelissero" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make clean In-Reply-To: <20011030093535.E592@jonc.itouch> References: <200110291311.f9TDBA033787@pelissero.org> <20011030093535.E592@jonc.itouch> X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: walter@pelissero.org X-Attribution: WP Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jonathan Chen writes: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:11:10PM +0000, Walter C. Pelissero wrote: > > Wouldn't make sense if Makefile in /usr/ports directory had > > NOCLEANDEPENDS=yes set by default? > > This would leave tons of working directories around if your port build > invoked dependancy-build which invoked other-dependancy builds, etc. Doesn't the make clean on the ports root directory (/usr/ports) go already through the cleaning of all the ports? Why do you need to check several times that every single port is clean? -- walter pelissero http://www.pelissero.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message