From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 26 22:26:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C71D796 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (mailuogwdur.emc.com [128.221.224.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com", Issuer "RSA Corporate Server CA v2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF17D607 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maildlpprd54.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd54.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.158]) by mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s2QMQSat015317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:26:28 -0400 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com s2QMQSat015317 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1395872788; bh=iOx3O+1hexg1bz7srKxeSoYxdNI=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=SgCZWMT+VOQ0EpDry4R9TQb5kualbaT49n50BOSO4932FrLayrCr+0u3PwU3LK12F rHFI1H6L/KYCGDYlIalqtX74IjLbGXA2kcltIuSZ0tzbK5SD0JV2hxjsF4bBwIFjpL 0ush2pVfZRj8gwV+/UEFFaJ0vncOy5vjjXeP1+yk= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com s2QMQSat015317 Received: from mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.21]) by maildlpprd54.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:26:24 -0400 Received: from mxhub13.corp.emc.com (mxhub13.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.234]) by mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s2QMQNpK015176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:26:24 -0400 Received: from MX01A.corp.emc.com ([169.254.255.185]) by mxhub13.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.234]) with mapi; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:26:23 -0400 From: "Kilner, Peter" To: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:26:22 -0400 Subject: ATF Test Cases Thread-Topic: ATF Test Cases Thread-Index: Ac9JQmsUZwcUuhowRj2375aBEsvZcw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com X-RSA-Classifications: public Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:26:37 -0000 Hello, I hope I am posting this question to the correct list. Is there a way to have a single ATF test case report multiple pass/fail res= ults? Currently I have seen that one can include a number of test conditio= ns in a single test case (for example many aft_checks). However the test c= ase will only report one pass/fail result for that case. I would like to build a test case that will iterate though many configurati= ons and would like to see a pass/fail for each config. However this is dif= ficult to implement with multiply test cases because of the for loops that = I am using. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you, Peter Kilner Software Engineer EMC, Isilon Seattle peter.kilner@isilon.com 206-777-7859