From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Sep 17 13:35:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4C20737B422; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 13:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA86368;
	Sun, 17 Sep 2000 22:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <200009172038.WAA86368@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 release on September 25th
In-Reply-To: <20000916174845.B28031@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> from "Valeriy E. Ushakov" at "Sep 16, 2000 05:48:45 pm"
To: uwe@ptc.spbu.ru (Valeriy E. Ushakov)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 22:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It seems Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> Hi, Soren.
> 
> I raised these issue before but got no reply.
> 
> What are the reasons that VCD patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~luoqi/
> is not commited?  It's been around for almost two years now and people
> use it successfully.  But reapplying the patch after each cvsup is
> kind of PITA.

Because I dont favour the ioctl interface, its no longer needed...

> If /dev/acd*t* is going to be the answer then can this be stated
> directly, please, to cut the confusion.  BTW, as I wrote just few days
> ago, acd*t* support was MFC'ed but relevant changes to MAKEDEV to
> create those devices were not.

No its not, you simply open /dev/acdNc and set the blocksize to
what you need with the CDRIOCSETBLKSIZE ioctl and reads the blocks
woth a normal read from the device....

-Søren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message