From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:20:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D34316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:20:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F80443D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:20:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6QKKBJ5005588; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:20:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <42E69AF7.4060406@centtech.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:20:07 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050603 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis References: <42E58007.9030202@rogers.com> <20050726004246.GA20597@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <42E595C3.2070003@rogers.com> <20050726015428.GF20597@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <4901.172.16.0.199.1122345549.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050726193324.GA4603@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <42E69574.2000107@centtech.com> <20050726200145.GB47478@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050726200145.GB47478@freebie.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wilko Bulte , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik Subject: Re: dhclient taking all cpu X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:20:18 -0000 Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:56:36PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote.. > >>Brooks Davis wrote: >> >>>On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:39:09PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Mon, July 25, 2005 9:54 pm, Brooks Davis said: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Probably something wrong with your interface, but you havent't >>>>>>>provided any useful information so who knows. At the very least, I >>>>>>>need to know what interface you are running on, something about it's >>>>>>>status, and if both dhclient processes are running. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>The interface is xl0 (3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL), and it worked >>>>>>in this machine fine for as long as i remember. This seems to have >>>>>>happened since a recent cvsup and buildworld from ~6-BETA to 7-CURRENT. >>>>>>I rebooted three times, and the problem occured rougly a minute after >>>>>>bootup. On the fourth time however, it seems to be ok so far. >>>>> >>>>>That sounds like a problem with the code that handles the link state >>>>>notifications in the interface driver. The notifications are a >>>>>reletivly >>>>>new feature that we're only now starting to use heavily so there are >>>>>going >>>>>to be bumps in the road. It would be intresting to know if you see link >>>>>state messages promptly if you plug and unplug the network cable. >>>> >>>>It seems to be back at it again, this time it took longer to kick in. >>>>Here >>>>is a "ps auxw|grep dhclient" : >>>> >>>>_dhcp 219 93.5 0.2 1484 1136 ?? Rs 8:49PM 5:06.00 >>>>dhclient: >>>>xl0 (dhclient) >>>>root 193 0.0 0.2 1484 1088 d0- S 8:49PM 0:00.02 >>>>dhclient: >>>>xl0 [priv] (dhclient) >>>> >>>>top: >>>> >>>>PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU >>>>COMMAND >>>>219 _dhcp 1 129 0 1484K 1136K RUN 9:33 94.24% >>>>dhclient >>>> >>>>Nothing in dmesg about link state changes on xl0. Unplugging and >>>>replugging the network cable results in link state notification within a >>>>couple seconds. >>> >>> >>>Could you see what happens if you run dhclient in the foreground? Just >>>running "dhclient -d xl0" should do it. I'd like to know what sort of >>>output it's generating. >> >>I have the same issue (with ath0). However, running it in the >>foreground doesn't show the problem. It seems to only break on bootup > > > In my case it does happend with dhclient in the foreground, and on ath(4) > > >>for me. Even running netif stop/start seems ok after I've killed it >>initially. It seems to be bringing ath0 up/down/up/down/etc when it's >>hogging CPU. You know, the second I sent that email, it went crazy. Looks like it was 5 minutes. But if I kill it, and run with -d, I don't see any extra output. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------