From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Apr 18 18:25:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B3814CAA for ; Sun, 18 Apr 1999 18:25:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id KAA14279; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:23:12 +0900 (JST) To: John Sconiers Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: jrs's message of Sun, 18 Apr 1999 18:54:24 EST. X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: -current PAO ( nic support) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:23:11 +0900 Message-ID: <14275.924484991@coconut.itojun.org> From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> Just give it a try... There was success report (after some patches by >> hand) on 3.1-STABLE. >One more question. I have two netowrk cards a: >3com Megahertz 10/100 PC Card model 3CXFE575BT >3com 10/100 model 3CCFE57BT-D >3com multifunction 10/100 + 56K model 3CCFEM556 >and a 3com Megahertz 56K modem model 3ccm156 >I looked at the FAQ and other info. These cards are ( or appear to be) >not supported. Are any of these cards simular to other supported >cards.....??? Which one do you think I would have a greater chance of >success with. The modem (3ccm156) should be okay. Other ones I can't tell... PAO3 guys didn't have a chance to test those yet, I think. (CardBus and/or multifunction are the hard ones, and does those cards fit into both of them?) itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message