From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 26 13:45:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com [65.24.0.112]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCCC37B718 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:45:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wmoran@iowna.com) Received: from iowna.com (dhcp065-024-023-038.columbus.rr.com [65.24.23.38]) by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2QLf1H26933; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:41:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3ABFB84D.7AAD8498@iowna.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:44:45 -0500 From: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Young Cc: ping.crosby@ntlworld.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What is the difference between Free, Net , and OpenBSD? References: <20010326211607.67D2.PING.CROSBY@ntlworld.com> <001101c0b639$c6ad2140$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Young wrote: > OpenBSD suffers from a > very quite > messy install routine but apart from that is essentially similar to > FreeBSD. In defense of OpenBSD, I wouldn't call the installation procedure "messy" so much as "technical" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message