From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 3 3:54:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-178-14.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.178.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBA737B4CF for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 03:54:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eA3BuhF04069; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 03:56:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200011031156.eA3BuhF04069@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Reifenberger Michael Cc: "'current@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: unwanteed halt & powerdown under -current (linuxerator?) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:08:01 +0100." <67E0BE167008D31185F60008C7289DA0E12F48@MCHH218E> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 03:56:43 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hi, > >> Hi, > >> executing /compat/linux/bin/rpm issues a halt and powerdown under -current > >> an my TECRA8000. > >> Is it just me? > > > >No. You don't have the Linux module loaded. There's a Linux system call > >which (alarmingly) maps to shutdown-and-poweroff if run as a FreeBSD > >binary. > Not really. See my previous mail. > It seems that a SYSV4 Syscall maps to the evil call. Unless you had the SVR4 module loaded, it would still have been run as a FreeBSD binary, which would give you exactly the same behaviour. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message