From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 2 21:43:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA29167 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 21:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mail.IDT.NET (mail.idt.net [198.4.75.205]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA29160 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 21:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sequoia (ppp-7.ts-1.mlb.idt.net [169.132.71.7]) by Mail.IDT.NET (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA17872; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 00:42:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <32534483.1CA8@mail.idt.net> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 1996 00:43:47 -0400 From: Gary Corcoran Reply-To: garycorc@mail.idt.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans CC: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Tor.Egge@idt.ntnu.no Subject: Re: Interrupt lossage in FreeBSD-current. References: <199610020731.RAA28429@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Bruce Evans wrote: > > >To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > >Subject: Interrupt lossage in FreeBSD-current. > > This should probably be To: freebsd-current :-). Ummm... I don't have the time to run -current, but I *am* interested in discussions on general hacker issues like interrupt latencies and real-time code. These issues could apply to new code/drivers written for released versions as well, so I was happy to be able to read this on a list I subscribe to (-hackers)... Just my opinion... ;-) Gary