From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 09:31:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A19106566C for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenity@exscape.org) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F45D8FC25 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-253-248-99.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.248.99]:44101 helo=mx.exscape.org) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Mq1hR-00061K-3Y; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:30:19 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (macbookpro [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.exscape.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D28060B1; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:30:10 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Thomas Backman In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:30:08 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5F305156-C760-4544-947A-EC952190381D@exscape.org> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090921112917.GA89971@freebsd.org> <20090921113556.GX95398@hoeg.nl> <1253537983.1757.5.camel@localhost> <1253540785.2134.85.camel@strangepork.london.mintel.ad> <20090922091455.208864fktn4do1c8@webmail.leidinger.net> To: Edho P Arief X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.248.99 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Mq1hR-00061K-3Y. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1Mq1hR-00061K-3Y c308206bfbf768219d9294d5e419231d Cc: Tom Evans , Alexander Leidinger , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:31:15 -0000 On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Edho P Arief wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger > wrote: >> To get back on-topic to the initial stuff: as a user of screen and >> a person >> which doesn't care if it is screen or tmux... I would prefer to not >> have >> anything like this in the base. It is not hard to install it on a >> machine, >> and if tmux there are frequent releases of tmux, it will always be >> outdated >> in FreeBSD and as such I would prefer to get it from ports. > > IIUC, the intention is to replace window(1). Or you're suggesting to > remove window(1) from base, too? There's no window(1) in my base system (8.0-RC1). Regards, Thomas