From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 15:49:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F28A16A403 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A086213C465 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (hmdazw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l35FnNvw013724; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:49:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l35FnNTw013723; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:49:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:49:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200704051549.l35FnNTw013723@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, gkontos.mail@gmail.com In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-hardware User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:49:29 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: HP BL460c X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, gkontos.mail@gmail.com List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:49:31 -0000 George Kontostanos wrote: > I tested the blades on the AMD platform with the Embedded NC370i Network > adapter and it works fine under 6-stable. I was wondering if there is any > patch that I could apply under 6-2 release for that network adapter. The > reason I'm asking is because we are talking for 3 servers 2ns and 1mail and > it would make me feel better following the release branch. I don't know if this makes you feel any better, but I've upgraded a lot of machines from 6.2-Release along RELENG_6 and haven't had a single problem. In fact some things seem more stable under RELENG_6 than under 6.2-R, for example NFS (seems to be faster, too, although I haven't done any benchmarks). YMMV, of course. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "When your hammer is C++, everything begins to look like a thumb." -- Steve Haflich, in comp.lang.c++