From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jul 3 15:40:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA26328 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 15:40:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from jmb@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA26307; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmb) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" Message-Id: <199807032240.PAA26307@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Q: FBSD license and multiple copyright holders In-Reply-To: <199807032004.PAA21559@nospam.hiwaay.net> from David Kelly at "Jul 3, 98 03:04:22 pm" To: dkelly@hiwaay.net (David Kelly) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 15:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Cc: smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Kelly wrote: > Dag-Erling Coidan Sm rgrav writes: > > > > Wouldn't it be a ball to see Microsoft print "This product includes > > software developed at the University of California, Berkeley" on the > > cover of every single Windows 98 or Windows NT CD? > > Think you just answered your own question, UCB might not care to be > that closely associated (rightly or wrongly) with Microsoft. Who would > want to be associated with Microsoft's network layer? > > Then again, it would be a hoot to see Microsoft squirm. remember what ms did to stacker. UCB would be wasting its money going after ms, as a practical matter. perhaps, once the doj suit gets rolling and ms is is "deep litigation"... wait for a critical time in the suit...then file. squeeze when they are already in trouble and snuff 'em. my....that's rather extreme, isnt it ;) jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message