From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 28 16:34:37 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2828D1065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net)
Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com
	[74.125.83.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70588FC16
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:34:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pvg6 with SMTP id 6so126834pvg.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.19.19 with SMTP id 19mr9767147was.17.1272472470120;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (c-67-189-160-65.hsd1.ny.comcast.net
	[67.189.160.65])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20sm9230755waa.3.2010.04.28.09.34.28
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (zeus.seibercom.net [192.168.1.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net)
	by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A813E15409
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:34:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:34:25 -0400
From: Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20100428123425.706d6e51@scorpio.seibercom.net>
Organization: Seibercom
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0)
X-Face: #"DtK&7^5P|u6yesiHW<_YTpWs>V8v|7J%W[b6O~\9emUr??J}9>jRP`j"a7j
	aE,2>V.`kdX53n; 0L; z[Y*]80/iO&<i; 24h%Itp9753ciK?c=8KyBp0
Face: 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
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Unknown IPFW log message
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:34:37 -0000

In the security.log, I have been noticing the following:

Apr 28 12:04:20 scorpio kernel: ipfw: 4400 Deny P:2 192.168.1.1 224.0.0.1 in via nfe0

I have not been able to document what the "P:2" stands for. Neither,
have I been able to find out if I should continue to allow the block to
continue. Googling has turned up a few posts that seem to indicate that
I should allow it.

-- 
Jerry
FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________

It's interesting to think that many quite
distinguished people have bodies similar to yours.