From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 19:07:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3E71065670 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CCE8FC16 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so3448783yxb.13 for ; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:07:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=rbQdw7X6cbRUTqE0glqpkNzmbpIz5LkohAt1foE5AK8=; b=hZng+XPXLVzH6Fr4n0NpqB+JiE5DWhcaIjK/Jp73aGjgSwDX6qsdB5A5SnXbktMxfh h4bjCXwuctNvL3y0Pd+Yps1rk+6FSaan5lqAsdko7eobEklr9/Q8t2bjrpLHrfxb+JNW bL6R+2sQbUu44UQJh7KW63zvOp/peMgw5iVJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=emqabPqrhBZePtUStFTgPlAm8m491URBFHUlE6eA4e4t0EaQF124LiFWyCMBN/88bI fmgNlB8A2LRnHH2ZzbeSud3P7l6F8hTmQatVT9rQRFwvH7PjG4AYkFvG+FauBRCt++Qd NPJzv9jFnBdtDtaYxrVoYoY0cqsgSazXaYDQg= Received: by 10.142.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr9248754wfc.196.1231268837914; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:07:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.161.6 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:07:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:07:17 +0200 From: "David Naylor" To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200901060801.54425.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200901061649.25762.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <200901060801.54425.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Transparent SOCKS proxy (server side)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:07:20 -0000 2009/1/6 Mel : > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a >> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers >> inside my network. >> >> I would like to set up a transparent SOCKS proxy (similar to transparent >> HTTP proxy, aka squid) on the server. Does anyone know how to do this (and >> which ports to use)? This needs to be a server side solution since I am >> unable to implement this on the clients... > > http://www.freshports.org/net/dante/ As far as I know dante can only be made "transparent" with the use of client side software (such as the libsocks.so libraries under *nix) and not from the server side (i.e. tunneling the traffic through a SOCKS proxy). The way I think of it is similar to NAT (in the capturing of traffic)? Or am I missing something? David