From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 16:11:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DF51065674 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB5D8FC20 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD3D2049; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:11:35 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Gordon Tetlow" References: <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:11:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com> (Gordon Tetlow's message of "Fri\, 27 Jun 2008 10\:37\:55 -0700") Message-ID: <86tzfdwnd4.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Milo Hyson , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Curious about SCM choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:11:37 -0000 "Gordon Tetlow" writes: > As an SCM expert at my place of employment, [...] As an SCM expert, you should know that neither CVS not Subversion are SCM tools. Neither are any of the other systems you mention, except perhaps, at a stretch, Perforce. They are version (or revision) control systems. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no