From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:40:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5512016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:40:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12C7643D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2005 20:40:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO klamath) [212.204.44.203] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 22:40:11 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20050726202239.GJ46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <42E6903D.1040107@freesbie.org> <20050726200214.GH46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <42E697E2.2050000@freesbie.org> <20050726202239.GJ46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8DxkoChrL/3R3miS56Yx" Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:40:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1122410410.1007.16.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: geom@freebsd.org, Dario Freni , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: geom_vol_cd9660 class X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:40:14 -0000 --=-8DxkoChrL/3R3miS56Yx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 22:22 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:06:58PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote: > +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> > What's wrong with glabel(8)? > +>=20 > +> Honestly, I didn't know it before. Looking into NanoBSD code I saw it > +> use GEOM_VOL, so I started investigate on geom_vol_ffs and write this > +> tiny class. Agreeing with Andreas Kohn on current@: > +>=20 > +> > +> But, the really important question is: why is there geom_vol_ffs and > +> geom_label? Apparently I wasn't the only one who did not see > +> geom_label :) > +> >=20 > That's actually my fault. I wanted to remove geom_vol_ffs long time > ago to not confuse the users. FYI, I found geom_vol_ffs via the bsdcan-04.slides.geom.pdf page 23, and after not seeing geom_vol_cd9660 (the obvious name following from the slides) started to build my own (using geom_vol_ffs as base, obviously). I found geom_label because I had some locking problems and was searching for sample code IIRC. Instead of removing geom_vol_ffs without any traces, could it be helpful to link geom_vol_ffs manpage (there is none currently) to glabel? Regards, -- Andreas --=20 was macht man eigentlich auf einer linux-gamer lan ? hl server aufsetzen und freuen ? *duck* ^^ --=-8DxkoChrL/3R3miS56Yx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC5p+pYucd7Ow1ygwRAilyAJ44YZL1QNPUuSOuF4SqIUNFF0eFvgCeKEPr Ugx89d0hkzyXSfl7b/ZC5Ks= =TQpw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8DxkoChrL/3R3miS56Yx--