From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 15 14:28:26 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D4B106564A;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from michael.larabel@phoronix.com)
Received: from phx1.phoronix.com (173.192.77.202-static.reverse.softlayer.com
	[173.192.77.202])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBED8FC13;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from c-98-193-96-120.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([98.193.96.120]
	helo=[172.16.93.133])
	by phx1.phoronix.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <michael.larabel@phoronix.com>)
	id 1RbCIL-00079g-BN; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:28:25 -0600
Message-ID: <4EEA0406.2010002@phoronix.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:28:22 -0600
From: Michael Larabel <michael.larabel@phoronix.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com>
	<CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ+zdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com>
	<CAFHbX1+5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan>
	<4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<op.v6iv3qe5g7njmm@michael-think>
	<4EE9C79B.7080607@phoronix.com> <4EE9F546.6060503@freebsd.org>
	<4EE9F7D2.4050607@phoronix.com> <4EEA0388.7010605@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EEA0388.7010605@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
	please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - phx1.phoronix.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - phoronix.com
Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
	Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	Michael Ross <gmx@ross.cx>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org,
	"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
	Server
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:28:26 -0000

On 12/15/2011 08:26 AM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> 15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет:
>> On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
>>> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel:
>>>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was 
>>>> used.
>>> Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with
>>> journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more 
>>> similar
>>> in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use
>>> with FreeBSD?
>>
>> I was running some ZFS vs. UFS tests as well and this happened to have
>> ZFS on when I was running some other tests.
>>
>
> Can we look at the tests?
> My opinion is ZFS without tuning is much slower than UFS2.
>

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNjg