From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 11 07:56:29 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7953B106564A
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:56:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.64.117])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37098FC0A
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:56:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3B7uRof059889;
	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:56:27 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
	by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3B7uQpE059888;
	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:56:26 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to
	glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:56:26 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
Message-ID: <20110411075626.GV84445@glebius.int.ru>
References: <4D947756.6050808@freebsd.lublin.pl>
	<4D9F6C71.1040209@frasunek.com> <4DA171BA.9000507@frasunek.com>
	<4DA1E39C.9090300@rdtc.ru> <4DA23090.8060206@frasunek.com>
	<20110411054932.GU84445@FreeBSD.org>
	<4DA2A5AA.4060802@frasunek.com> <4DA2ABFA.7030108@rdtc.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DA2ABFA.7030108@rdtc.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, Przemyslaw Frasunek <przemyslaw@frasunek.com>
Subject: Re: mpd5/Netgraph issues after upgrading to 7.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:56:29 -0000

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:21:30PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
E> On 11.04.2011 13:54, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
E> >> IMO, any kind of memory allocation code (malloc, uma, netgraph item
E> >> allocator) never return EPERM, they return ENOMEM or ENOBUFS.
E> >>
E> >> So, there is a bug somewhere else.
E> > 
E> > I think so, but for me it still looks like resource shortage.  As I wrote
E> > before, when EPERM starts appearing, I'm unable to run "ngctl list".
E> 
E> Increase sysctl kern.ipc.maxsockbuf.
E> I was forced to rise it upto 80MB (sic!) as 8MB was not enough to me.

Ah, I found where EPERM comes from. Will fix it soon.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.