From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Dec 5 04:05:54 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id EAA03990 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 04:05:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from scotty.masternet.it (scotty.masternet.it [194.184.65.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id EAA03984 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 04:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from Gmarco (ts1port12d.masternet.it [194.184.65.34]) by scotty.masternet.it (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA26082; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 13:05:37 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19961205130119.00b36d14@scotty.masternet.it> X-Sender: gmarco@scotty.masternet.it X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 13:01:23 +0100 To: wjjr@sapphire (John J. Rushford) From: Gianmarco Giovannelli Subject: Re: Adaptec 2940 AU on 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 17.43 04/12/96 -0700, John J. Rushford wrote: >Hi, > >I've got a pentium equiped as follows and I cannot load FreeBSD 2.1.5, >apparently the Adaptec 2940AU is not recognized so my CDROM is not >found. I thought the 2940 was supported? Any ideas on what I can >do. After downloading a new boot disk and driver update, I can >successfully load Solaris 2.5.1 x86 but, I would prefer FreeBSD. >Apparently even Solaris would not recognize the 2940AU. Should I >find a plain vanilla 2940? I am sorry for my previous answer but I not see the A after 2940 :-) It could be the controller :-) Regards... +-------------------------------------+--------------------+ | Internet: gmarco@masternet.it | ,,, | | Internet: gmarco@fi.nettuno.it | (o o) | | http://www2.masternet.it/~gmarco | ---oo0-(_)-0oo--- | | http://www2.masternet.it/ | Gianmarco | +-------------------------------------+--------------------+