From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 00:23:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11D716A41F; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 00:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE2E43D46; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 00:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by patsy.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3263117B81C; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 02:23:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from patsy.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (patsy.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23719-01-6; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 02:23:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from radagast.ijs.si (radagast.ijs.si [193.2.4.168]) by patsy.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDF017B81A; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 02:23:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.ijs.si (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by radagast.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4E61702B; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 02:23:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Doug Barton Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 02:23:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200508060150.00580.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <42F3FEC8.80509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <42F3FEC8.80509@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508060223.06856.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Cc: A Dude , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: windowmaker 0.92 fails on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:23:23 -0000 On Saturday 06 of August 2005 02:05, Doug Barton wrote: > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > I can test as well. > > I tried earlier with this patch to Makefile: > > > > --- Makefile.orig Sat Aug 6 01:40:59 2005 > > +++ Makefile Sat Aug 6 01:41:04 2005 > > @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ > > > > .include > > > > +.if ${ARCH} == amd64 > > +CONFIGURE_ENV+= ac_cv_c_inline_asm=no > > +.endif > > + > > .if defined(WITH_XINERAMA) || defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) > > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-xinerama > > .endif > > Ok, that's the kind of feedback I need. :) You said you tried, did it > succeed? :) Ah, yes it indeed compiled successfully :) > > and a patch to fix Qt based popup windows referenced here: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-July/024661.html > > and these worked so far. > > Sorry for my failure to understand you here. Are you saying that you tried > that patch on an amd64 system and it worked for you? If so, (and my testing > proves that it doesn't harm 32 bit platforms), then I have no objection to > including it. Yes. For example - before this patch using Kmail in Windowmaker and selecting in menu Settings -> Configure Kmail... would result in configure window being placed basically somewhere outside of anything (for quite some time I thought Kmail was freezing); selecting it via middle click on root window brought it back however. With this patch there are no more problems with misplaced windows - the Configure window from example shows on top of desktop. I'm running Windowmaker 0.92 on amd64 now with this patch and the above one that made it compile successfully so I'd say include it please :) Dejan