From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 09:54:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B319A16A41F for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:54:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from thorn.pobox.com (thorn.pobox.com [208.210.124.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0CD43D5C for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:54:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from thorn (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thorn.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506D1B4 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 04:54:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thorn.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E761000 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 04:54:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Ehl90-0004Xj-Rw for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:54:26 +0000 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:54:26 +0000 From: Brian Candler To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051201095426.GD17378@uk.tiscali.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: current@ and freebsd-current@ X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:54:29 -0000 I see a number of mails cross-posted to current@freebsd.org and freebsd-current@freebsd.org, and so get two copies in the freebsd-current digest I receive. Is there any reason to have two addresses pointing at this list? As far as I can see from the web, 'freebsd-current@' is the advertised address. If current@ is a legacy hangover, could it be killed? Regards, Brian.