From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  9 18:00:53 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F289C4A
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Apr 2014 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22f.google.com (mail-ve0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA38191F
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Apr 2014 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id oz11so2374673veb.6
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=mVdpKLIWULCHfF0A046PCRr5zuLYAhCcxSnYVhNEex0=;
 b=MtLReRv3z8u9d90WKl0Hyb/fBRo4VXQ0NQqH7QNEA5f5KRxgTrkEMSKoJ2jpoFgDn9
 MdwscMrl7+YUjDTF9DmjEeZHS2UjGneeATLW1u4gzpOx4u4Dj5RFIQTzbouXNeoV780s
 eLYHf6qkX4I7n05wWQ7oVvZBrOwWhNy75zIvD600EurIDqQvalLU3crFMSAeyIFqKXOz
 DYOGPp5fOW1Og1waBDGU6qLz9G95X6uwPOcXqLZ3wNRO2VV4BluRpppQcfZ9N6efs6av
 BJxrlnx4SeQfPnqHYHp2bT9c9BrefZUyIkqk7KVOkBjN3BGCvtvjQw/YYv1iWaaQFKPp
 Ap8Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.230.103 with SMTP id sx7mr1724754vec.28.1397066452528;
 Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.39.130 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3g3r546WVbz62Xv@devnoip.rootservice.org>
References: <CAA3htvve4NNvmN0QOf6v4RwbT8PmGrSCFzNCbivfaEMN7J26Ow@mail.gmail.com>
 <3g3r546WVbz62Xv@devnoip.rootservice.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:00:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAA3htvtSOGdfUQY9SiAQu5SUzgRxs6izyLjjMPWtKao8HjJo+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal
From: Pawel Biernacki <pawel.biernacki@gmail.com>
To: joeuser@rootservice.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:00:53 -0000

On 9 April 2014 17:08, Joe User <mailinglists@rootservice.org> wrote:
> On 09.04.2014 17:29, Pawel Biernacki wrote:
>> [snip]
>> We need more transparency here.
>>
>
> Please read this and other related threads and you'll understand that
> the FreeBSD-SecTeam had no real chance to react earlier than they did.
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q2/22
>
> In fact, they were realy fast, thanks therefor.

Interesting lecture, thank you. But if FreeBSD SO wasn't on the
mentioned list it's an argument for payable position because that can
help developing more efficient social network in the future ;-).

-- 
One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never
even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.