From owner-cvs-all  Fri Jan 30 16:00:59 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA25438
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:00:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from friley585.res.iastate.edu (friley585.res.iastate.edu [129.186.167.85])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA25433
          for <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:00:56 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from ccsanady@friley585.res.iastate.edu)
Received: from friley585.res.iastate.edu (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by friley585.res.iastate.edu (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA03567;
	Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:59:59 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199801302359.RAA03567@friley585.res.iastate.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>,
        "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>,
        Evan Champion <evanc@synapse.net>, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr,
        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files options src/sys/i386/conf LINT 
 src/sys/i386/i386 autoconf.c src/sys/kern init_main.c init_sys
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:43:21 +0100."
             <894.886203801@critter.freebsd.dk> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:59:59 -0600
From: Chris Csanady <ccsanady@friley585.res.iastate.edu>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe cvs-all"


>In message <34D260C0.41C67EA6@whistle.com>, Julian Elischer writes:
>>John S. Dyson wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> > Having to wait 30 minutes for my servers to fsck sure makes LFS a pretty
>>> > appealing idea to me, and it's really too bad that it has been shelved.  
>>If
>>> > there's something physically wrong with the LFS and someone has a better
>>> > idea, that's one thing, but otherwise I hope someone is able to resurrect
>>> > LFS soon...
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>well, there's the 'soft-updates' work..
>
>Doesn't really help the fsck issue...

Well, it provides for enough consistency that the fsck can then be run
in the background.  I think that this is a big win..

Chris Csanady

>--
>Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
>phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
>"Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!"