From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Dec  5 05:22:20 1996
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA06985
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 05:22:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from narcissus.ml.org (brosenga.st.pitzer.edu [134.173.120.201])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id FAA06980
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 05:22:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ben@localhost) by narcissus.ml.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA13738; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 05:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 05:22:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: pcvt under 2.1.5 -- any reason not to?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961205052058.13733A-100000@narcissus.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I am considering switching from pccons to pcvt, to make telnetting less 
of a hassle.  Would that break anything?  Does anyone know why pcvt isn't 
the default console term?

TIA.



 Ben

The views expressed above are not those of the Worker's Compensation 
Board of Queensland, Australia.