From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 3 14:06:24 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA27526 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 14:06:24 -0800 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA27505 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 14:06:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA19297; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 14:03:51 -0800 To: Rafael Pelayo Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PSM identified in sysctl hardware table In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 03 Dec 1995 20:08:41 GMT." <199512032008.UAA00198@calypso> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 1995 14:03:51 -0800 Message-ID: <19295.818028231@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > to my company (GSI Limited). This is only to protect us as we are looking > at releasing a distribution of the FreeBSD OS sometime in early to mid 1996. Oh? May I ask whether or not you intend to work actively with the project in doing so, or is this is a purely commercial venture? In either case, it might be worth everyone's while to try and incorporate any changes as cooperatively as possible. There's certainly no need to fractionalize the *BSD world any further if we can possibly avoid it! > The blurb is the basic BSD notice with the addition that the redistribution > is restricted to this code, and no code we may change in psm.c and not place > under the general redistribution. Does anybody have a problem with this ? I'm not sure I understand it, is the problem. I don't understand the conditions imposed by clause 1 and I'm not sure what you're getting at in clause 2. Could you perhaps clarify this? Jordan