From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 31 18:54:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8585C106566C for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8118FC19 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so251075fgg.13 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=bkr3PdSllCy7Q8LZqtSyMYqxg6ykMECCdm2Vur+6GQw=; b=OUYHxpq1G1yppQd9xWqSMbZ8WVONlc9flOqG38Srr4gAxXCQ5X26NHMYxLmGxD76cJ vYxoNDTpygIwubpM15uzx0M5c29CbfPQkWhlUodb+qsF9LjTaBFEXhdIqLs08PEeOtb2 ILvgW8DBqKON6DRDG2ZlX4RZqvuQngyuyeJZA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZBJcaS/AgQ2GsRWlXKZ/ffYD1j67xl1SDVZc4hTqNmlCn/boKkNw5ZALV0xhODg5k5 v4xrZPFms9LXSAwi3IW1Wx+JBaQnhebJGpU5kF/oKfdILVCbOf4aPdjyTT+qtDmDuFHz 3yWz4Gpfn708BgJ8jq9APjo8CpPUB0yt5M/6s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.142 with SMTP id o14mr2376074bkw.125.1257015261627; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:54:21 +0100 Message-ID: <6101e8c40910311154j16125ffawd4d4f34e5ba50706@mail.gmail.com> From: Oliver Pinter To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: CVE-2009-0689 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:54:23 -0000 Hello list! I have a small question from CVE-2009-0689[1]: The commit r197059 fixed this bug or not? On security lists its marked as high priority and find it at juni. some info: [1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0689 [2] http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/63 [3] http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Oct/357