From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 16 21:10:14 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA16DAF2;
 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:10:14 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.223.176])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58A7E2B;
 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:10:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 13so3445077iea.35
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:10:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=nolcdjVd3SNdSk8GRAcsGvSKiwTMnbinLg90i5vq4w4=;
 b=ug92oaftl7Dx8/lvyXbrh3isJBHFv12eU5iiCMaT5zj1AwPJG4Xlul5FZrWIgXfSoH
 NSg6I66BLHFla/EXdL2KTquxFQ3O/8NccagBnsiPQFZM02Hn1GtwOQy/uOs21POp2jCs
 uOHWUAuGXLK1Hyb53BDqxXrlsJGQ6fv/al/xLQzxdbysLiZw3F/+6CghpRacqLhKI3+o
 Fuj65+Oom6u/05OiAzIFKJOPVhd9XLgzN78IgdOygO1KGxXm2qi3W12N737ipDdKbYYT
 BYF90KKdN69MwEwPaVpKT1Pa/jJ4Gmpy1bfAa6Qv6o8C5znp2x7YvtEcprZArVR4nIEu
 8pkw==
X-Received: by 10.50.153.194 with SMTP id vi2mr1963304igb.15.1358370614379;
 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:10:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: utisoft@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.16.73 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:09:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmx0bJcW-iP_a8B3y9x9T+xF0MNsW55ciJJOnKPfQEMSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF6rxgkjxAmFjr=qp+DC83AqvY4CMXVn5=CQCfQi_aKn3bnoRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <50463F7F.2030502@shatow.net>
 <CABzXLYNQBVZAkL+-HMUVduzq_UKLEjbQFE4zn_KhCBE3agX-Hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF6rxgmx0bJcW-iP_a8B3y9x9T+xF0MNsW55ciJJOnKPfQEMSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:09:44 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fbhQFL5axPhFRUhFYm_Sw4WVGIc
Message-ID: <CADLo83-126TsyWatUREysrk2gR7+acxWqTxmW0WhwH=QYW=hfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?
To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>,
 Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net>, Ports Management Team <portmgr@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:10:14 -0000

On 16 January 2013 20:48, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:
> On 11 September 2012 12:13, Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> wrote:
>> 2012/9/4 Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net>:
>>>> My proposal:
>>>> - start an exp-run with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set
>>>> - mark all new failures with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE
>>>> - flip the default right after the 9.1 release.
> ...
>
> It has been months since I sent this mail without any official reply
> whatsoever.   At this point the exp-run machines are down and not
> likely to return in the *near* future.
>
> Can I propose that this flag be flipped without an exp-run and fix the
> fallout?   It has been widely tested and has had exp-runs in the past.

I think this would be extremely hard to justify, given that the ports
tree is a live entity.  We would effectively be asking our end users
to debug MAKE_JOBS.  This is not acceptable; we can't plan to have
fallout.

Chris