From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 12:10:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A848116A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578D043D48 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=roam.psg.com) by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dfcug-0009Be-2Q; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:10:34 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=roam.psg.com.psg.com) by roam.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DfcuY-0002Bz-AJ; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 05:10:26 -0700 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17061.36529.813669.724203@roam.psg.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 05:10:25 -0700 To: Brooks Davis References: <20050607034620.GA32718@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <17061.12218.324940.491539@roam.psg.com> <20050607054745.GA10355@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: OpenBSD dhclient incoming X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:10:37 -0000 >> for those of us who use a lot of the kinkier hacks of isc dhclient >> (and dhcpd) [0], i presume we will still be able to install this >> week's isc snapshots and keep runing, yes? >> >> [0] - dynamic dns update, wifi ssid search list, ... > > It depends. This is a fork of the isc client so some of that will still > be supported, for example dhclient.conf is still supported. Other stuff > many require the use of the isc one which will be tricky because they > have vastly differnet modes of operation and thus the startup scripts > scripts are different. > > I intend to treat this as code we can modify so if we need features, > they can be added. We've also heard form Ted Lemon recently and he's > working on simplifying the ISC code so at some point in the future, we > could switch back if that were warranted. ummm. maybe i was insufficiently clear. i am happy to keep running isc snapshot(s). i just wanted to be sure you were not changing the api on which they sit. randy