From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 15:00:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E89A16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:00:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1524943D46 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 46121 invoked by uid 399); 31 Jan 2006 17:33:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jan 2006 17:33:43 -0000 Message-ID: <43DF9F75.8020801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:33:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trix@basement.net References: <43DD0997.3422.3D6D968C@dan.langille.org> <43DDE3CB.23838.6E6C5F@dan.langille.org> <43DF7CAF.2000501@basement.net> In-Reply-To: <43DF7CAF.2000501@basement.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: bacula-server-1.38.5_1 rc scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:00:25 -0000 Trix Farrar wrote: > There are actually an embarrassing number of options; > > Of course, there are the "normal" enable options; bacula_fd_enable, > bacula_sd_enable and bacula_dir_enable. The scripts are written so that > , I believe, they should run on NetBSD as well using bacula_fd, > bacula_sd, and bacula_dir respectively. Sorry I'm coming late to this thread, but it sounds like you've put a lot of good work into this port, and the update to rc.d style scripts, thanks for that. :) Just one question, I assume from what you've written here that you have 3 separate rc.d scripts for these 3 separate services, is that correct? If so, thanks, as that is the way to handle a situation like you described (if I am understanding it correctly). Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection