From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 23 10:57: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bdc1.troikanetworks.com (unknown [12.31.172.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F271E37B4C5 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kbailey@localhost) by bdc1.troikanetworks.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA56300 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:56:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbailey) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:56:53 -0700 From: Kevin Bailey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ed0 broken in 4.1.1 ? Message-ID: <20001023105653.N23934@stout.troikanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I upgraded to 4.1.1 via make buildworld/installworld. When I booted the new kernel, it didn't see my ethernet NIC. It didn't say 'not found'; it didn't mention the card AT ALL. Yet it does show the ed0 configuration: > en ed0 ... I suspected I screwed something up and proceeded to make and boot 4.1.1 boot/install floppies. That kernel didn't mention my ethernet card either! I managed to keep a 4.1.0 GENERIC kernel around and so I'm successfully running with it but, since the rest of my system is 4.1.1, I'd really like the 4.1.1 kernel to see my card. It's a D-Link DE-something, NE2000 compatible AFAIK. It uses ed0, of course. It does not use the standard IO address or IRQ but I entered those wherever needed (and, if I got them wrong, I'd expect a message saying 'ed0 not found at ...'.) I haven't seen anyone else mention the problem on -questions. Any ideas anyone ? P.S. Reply address is bogus, please reply to list. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message