From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 23 18:21:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A24016A437 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE7343D83 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807F51A3C1C; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:20:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DCEBE5118E; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:20:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:20:02 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Casey Scott Message-ID: <20060323182002.GA84524@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <31203190.1741143131135280.JavaMail.root@tomcat.phantombsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31203190.1741143131135280.JavaMail.root@tomcat.phantombsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:21:33 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:25:35AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote: >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kris Kennaway > To: Casey Scott > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 0:27:30 AM GMT-0800 > Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error >=20 > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:27:56AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote: > > I just upgraded 5.4 stable to 6.1 PRERELEASE via buildworld. I am tryin= g to build a kernel, and keep getting this error at "make". > >=20 > >=20 > > ...... > > cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=3Dpentium4 -Wall -Wredundan= t-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointe= r-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=3Dc99 -nostdinc -I-= -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../.= ./../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freeb= sd -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTI= ON_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=3D8000 --param = inline-unit-growth=3D100 --param large-function-growth=3D1000 -mno-align-l= ong-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -m= no-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1172: warning: redundant redeclaration = of 'devfs_ops_f' > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:70: warning: previous declaration of 'd= evfs_ops_f' was here > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1183: warning: redundant redeclaration = of 'devfs_vnodeops' > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:68: warning: previous declaration of 'd= evfs_vnodeops' was here > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1205: warning: redundant redeclaration = of 'devfs_specops' > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:69: warning: previous declaration of 'd= evfs_specops' was here > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > >=20 > > I even get that error building a kernel from the GENERIC config. I thin= k something is wonky with gcc. >Has anyone else seen this, or know what cou= ld be causing it? > > > >You didn't follow the correct upgrade order - it's documented in the > >handbook and in /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > >Kris >=20 > Thanks for that info. I have the kernel built now. I noticed that it > is built from the source in /usr/obj and not /usr/src. No, /usr/obj contains the results of your buildworld, it's not a second copy of the source. > In 6.x, do we > have to keep /usr/obj after installworld, or should installworld > have updated /usr/src ? You do not have to keep /usr/obj. Kris P.S. Please wrap your lines so that your emails may be easily read. --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEIubSWry0BWjoQKURAhhhAJ9d2U6uBDov2CCUTWLS25ufaB5AXQCeKHqw +stTOBer1pmQwic7kxSOFeI= =xwgc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--