From owner-freebsd-java Tue Dec 11 2:31:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from gnuppy.monkey.org (cx739861-a.dt1.sdca.home.com [24.5.164.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EBA37B405 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:31:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from billh by gnuppy.monkey.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16DkBL-000295-00; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:30:39 -0800 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:30:39 -0800 To: Nate Williams Cc: absinthe@pobox.com, Bill Huey , shanon loveridge , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jdk1.3.1p5 Message-ID: <20011211103039.GA8233@gnuppy> References: <20011210001702.10731.qmail@web14303.mail.yahoo.com> <20011210024138.GA3148@gnuppy> <20011209223635.A1152@absinthe> <15380.15272.167683.46148@caddis.yogotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15380.15272.167683.46148@caddis.yogotech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i From: Bill Huey Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:35:52PM -0700, Nate Williams wrote: > Why? The native threading that we're using now is no better/worse than > the internal green threads implementation. Without kernel threads, > native threads have *EXACTLY* the same sorts of problems that exist with > green threads. It's not native threading per se as much as HotSpot. The port can't be taken seriously until that is fully working, so what's being said isn't a directly about native threading. bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message