From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 23:29:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E02106564A; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 23:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (152-39.3-213.fix.bluewin.ch [213.3.39.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8A38FC18; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 23:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from beaver (beaver.home.critical.ch [192.168.1.3]) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.3/8.14.3/critical-1.9) with SMTP id mA3NTm7r059073; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:29:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:29:42 +0100 From: Emanuel Haupt To: "Alexander Churanov" Message-Id: <20081104002942.f136adec.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0811031506g4b450865q34d33988a688c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20c4814a0811030712n4105c765p23983b55f729b25e@mail.gmail.com> <20081103192933.e4aeedef.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <3cb459ed0811031237l3adeef89t86a70030cca57fff@mail.gmail.com> <20081103223115.78fbbaef.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <3cb459ed0811031506g4b450865q34d33988a688c3@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mx.critical.ch [192.168.1.2]); Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:29:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/8560/Mon Nov 3 20:20:13 2008 on alaska.home.critical.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Emanuel Haupt , Flex Subject: Re: Boost 1.37 released! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:29:51 -0000 > Emanuel, > > Copying devel/boost to devel/boost-devel sounds reasonable. > > However, I'd like to suggest moving devel/boost to devel/boost-134 and > having devel/boost updated to 1.37. For me '-devel' is always felt like > something not stable enough. Another concern is that maintaners of ports > that depend on boost would probably slow down the process of updating to > 1.37. Forking to old version contains element of intention - it's more clear > that devel/boost-134 is something out of date and temporary. This would involve much more initial work. We have many -devel ports that are actually just more recent versions. Once there is a working 1.37 port either people will start moving to 1.37, bringing the new version to each maintainers attention would help. At some point devel/boost will become 1.37 and devel/boost-devel will then either be removed or updated to a never version. Emanuel