From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 31 12:49:20 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DBB106568F;
	Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brueffer@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BD88FC1F;
	Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:49:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9VCnJUb061785;
	Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:49:19 GMT
	(envelope-from brueffer@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from brueffer@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9VCnJb4061781;
	Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:49:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from brueffer)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:49:19 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <200910311249.n9VCnJb4061781@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: killasmurf86@gmail.com, brueffer@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
From: brueffer@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: docs/138204: invalid reference in manual less(1)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:49:20 -0000

Synopsis: invalid reference in manual less(1)

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: brueffer
State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 31 13:45:58 CET 2009
State-Changed-Why: 
Hi Aldis, pluknet is right.  When you read the whole sentence
it becomes clear that (1) and (2) refer to the two licenses
less can be distributed under.
Although one could argue that it almost looks like a manpage
reference, I think the difference is sufficiently clear when
taking the context into account.

Nontheless thanks for the report!

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138204