From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 06:00:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC2781F; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5214B2FE5; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.26.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EB5435C7; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 01:00:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <52242960.3060700@marino.st> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 08:00:00 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r325857 - in head/devel/opencl: . files References: <201309011425.r81EPB4v049325@svn.freebsd.org> <20130902014500.GF43972@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130902014500.GF43972@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, John Marino , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:00:42 -0000 On 9/2/2013 03:45, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 02:25:11PM +0000, John Marino wrote: >> New Revision: 325857 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/325857 >> >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ >> >> PORTNAME= opencl >> PORTVERSION= 1.2 >> -PORTREVISION= 2 >> +PORTREVISION= 5 > > Wow, now *that's* a BUMP! :) Why so high? The PR seemed to indicate that it something the maintainer was internally tracking it. I couldn't figure out if he was bumping each one so we wouldn't get the patches mixed up, or if he had some kind of internal configuration control. Since the important thing is that the number changes and increases, I didn't feel like having a back-and-forth over 3 vs 5. I may have made the wrong decision (well, probably did) but I felt the consequences were minor in any case. John