From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 25 10: 0:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from henny.webweaving.org (gate.qubesoft.com [212.113.16.243]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3C237B42C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:00:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from n_hibma@qubesoft.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by henny.webweaving.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3PH0lr67131; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:00:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from n_hibma@qubesoft.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:00:47 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Hibma X-X-Sender: To: Doug Barton Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imap-uw Makefile distinfo pkg-message ports/mail/imap-uw/files patch-ac patch-ah patch-ai In-Reply-To: <20010425123931.A53267@guinness.osdn.com> Message-ID: <20010425175852.D66927-100000@henny.webweaving.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes, that would be much appreciated, Doug. By sheer chance I was just looking at upgrading imap-uw a mere half an hour ago, and then I read this thread about imap and having to upgrade every half an hour to keep up to date which didn't sound to good to me. Cheers, Nick P.S.: I LOVE ports. What a great idea. > > > > dougb 2001/04/24 22:43:33 PDT > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > mail/imap-uw Makefile distinfo pkg-message > > > > mail/imap-uw/files patch-ac patch-ah patch-ai > > > > Log: > > > > Update to 0104241750. The maintainer submitted an update for the > > > > previous version, however they _just_ updated the version today. > > > > The only thing I did differently from the maintainer's patch was > > > > to regen patch-ai. > > > > > > Is there any particular reason why this port is following the betas > > > that seem to change every other day and leave it broken instead of > > > 2000c? I don't use this port or even IMAP, I just noticed that > > > people are always complaining about it being broken on -ports. Just > > > curious. > > > > I'm starting to think that we need an imap-uw-devel category for this, > > and that we should revert imap-uw to 2000c. I do use this port, and > > the last two snapshots have resulted in a problem where mail that I > > delete keeps coming back from the trash marked unread. > > I think having an imap-uw-devel port would be a good thing. > > - jim > > -- > - jim mock - O|S|D|N - open source development network - > - http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org - jim@FreeBSD.org - > -- Qube Software, Ltd. Private: n_hibma@qubesoft.com n_hibma@webweaving.org n_hibma@FreeBSD.ORG http://www.qubesoft.com/ http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message